OpenListvsUrocissa
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenList | Urocissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 34 in File Management | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 25 340 | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +571 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 18 |
| Latest release | v4.2.9 · 25 Oct 2026 | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
OpenList scores 80/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
Urocissa ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for OpenList.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenList is easier to run; Urocissa needs more configuration.
OpenList is growing faster right now (+571 stars in 30 days).
OpenList details →Urocissa details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenList, compare it with
Keep Urocissa, compare it with