openITCOCKPITvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openITCOCKPIT | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 402 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 4 |
| Latest release | openITCOCKPIT-5.9.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
WBO scores 61/100 against 54/100 for openITCOCKPIT, so it is the safer default.
openITCOCKPIT ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; openITCOCKPIT needs more configuration.
WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).
openITCOCKPIT details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep openITCOCKPIT, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with