openITCOCKPITvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openITCOCKPIT | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 54/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 402 | 35 799 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 | +838 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 28 |
| Latest release | openITCOCKPIT-5.9.0 · 22 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 54/100 for openITCOCKPIT, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for openITCOCKPIT.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+838 stars in 30 days).
openITCOCKPIT details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep openITCOCKPIT, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with