OpenFan Controllervstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenFan Controller | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #63 of 104 in Home Automation | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 321 | 24 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +775 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 11 |
| Latest release | 2026-10-09 · 9 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | CSS | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 50/100 for OpenFan Controller, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for OpenFan Controller.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenFan Controller is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+775 stars in 30 days).
OpenFan Controller details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenFan Controller, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with