openDCIMvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openDCIM | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 369 | 24 063 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +785 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 11 |
| Latest release | 26.01 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0-only | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 48/100 for openDCIM, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openDCIM.
temporal is growing faster right now (+785 stars in 30 days).
openDCIM details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep openDCIM, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with