openDCIMvsOrca
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openDCIM | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 369 | 109 581 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +9 674 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 17 |
| Latest release | 26.01 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0-only | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 48/100 for openDCIM, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for openDCIM.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; openDCIM needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+9 674 stars in 30 days).
openDCIM details →Orca details →
Swap a project
Keep openDCIM, compare it with
Keep Orca, compare it with