Open Data Capturevstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Open Data Capture | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Data Collection | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 119 | 24 057 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +779 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.5.2 · 25 Sept 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 47/100 for Open Data Capture, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Open Data Capture.
If you want the quickest setup, Open Data Capture is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+779 stars in 30 days).
Open Data Capture details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep Open Data Capture, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with