Open Data CapturevsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Open Data Capture | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 47/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Data Collection | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 119 | 95 266 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 353 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 25 |
| Latest release | v2.5.2 · 25 Sept 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 47/100 for Open Data Capture, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Open Data Capture.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 353 stars in 30 days).
Open Data Capture details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep Open Data Capture, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with