openclawvsTypecho
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | Typecho | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 124 in AI | #1 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 393 322 | 12 456 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 898 | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | ci · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 66/100 for Typecho, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Typecho.
If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 898 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →Typecho details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep Typecho, compare it with