llama.cppvsTypecho
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | Typecho | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #1 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 132 699 | 12 456 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 244 | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1465 | 2 |
| Latest release | b11979 · 29 Oct 2026 | ci · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 66/100 for Typecho, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1465 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Typecho.
If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →Typecho details →