openclawvstxtdot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | txtdot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #19 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 393 300 | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 876 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 5 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.10.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 47/100 for txtdot, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for txtdot.
If you want the quickest setup, txtdot is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 876 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →txtdot details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep txtdot, compare it with