openclawvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 393 247 | 117 613 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 899 | +5 254 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 86/100 for TradingAgents, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
openclaw details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with