llama.cppvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 132 607 | 117 655 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 250 | +5 296 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1453 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.8.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Python |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 86/100 for TradingAgents, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1453 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
llama.cpp details →TradingAgents details →