openclawvsTeleport
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | Teleport | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #4 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 393 265 | 21 040 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 917 | +104 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 6 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | v18.10.0 · 8 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 76/100 for Teleport, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Teleport.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; Teleport needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 917 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →Teleport details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep Teleport, compare it with