llama.cppvsTeleport
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | Teleport | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #4 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 132 628 | 21 040 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 271 | +104 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1455 | 6 |
| Latest release | b11963 · 28 Oct 2026 | v18.10.0 · 8 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Go |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 76/100 for Teleport, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1455 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Teleport.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; Teleport needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 271 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →Teleport details →