openclawvssandboxed.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | sandboxed.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #97 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 393 295 | 672 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 947 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 8 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | android-v1.21.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for sandboxed.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; sandboxed.sh needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 947 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →sandboxed.sh details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep sandboxed.sh, compare it with