openclawvsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 393 295 | 35 504 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 947 | +1 772 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 5 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
openclaw details →RustFS details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep RustFS, compare it with