llama.cppvsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 132 674 | 35 504 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 317 | +1 772 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1461 | 5 |
| Latest release | b11972 · 28 Oct 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1461 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
llama.cpp details →RustFS details →