openclawvsrushdb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | rushdb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #5 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 393 312 | 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 888 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 33 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 48/100 for rushdb, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 33 for rushdb.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; rushdb needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 888 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →rushdb details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep rushdb, compare it with