llama.cppvsrushdb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | rushdb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #5 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 132 689 | 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 234 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1464 | 33 |
| Latest release | b11978 · 29 Oct 2026 | v3.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 48/100 for rushdb, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1464 stable releases in the past year, against 33 for rushdb.
If you want the quickest setup, llama.cpp is easier to run; rushdb needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 234 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →rushdb details →