openclawvsQuestarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | Questarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 124 in AI | #39 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 393 335 | 703 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 911 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 7 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.5.0 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 56/100 for Questarr, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Questarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Questarr is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 911 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →Questarr details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep Questarr, compare it with