openclawvsqBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #1 of 7 in Torrent |
| GitHub stars | 393 291 | 1 758 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 943 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 52 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Dockerfile |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 37 for openclaw.
If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 943 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), compare it with