llama.cppvsqBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #1 of 7 in Torrent |
| GitHub stars | 132 669 | 1 758 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 312 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1461 | 52 |
| Latest release | b11972 · 28 Oct 2026 | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Dockerfile |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 67/100 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io), so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1461 stable releases in the past year, against 52 for qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io).
If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 312 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) details →