openclawvsPaddleOCR Local
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | PaddleOCR Local | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 124 in AI | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 393 359 | 138 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 935 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 | 0 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.9 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 44/100 for PaddleOCR Local, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for PaddleOCR Local.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; PaddleOCR Local needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 935 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →PaddleOCR Local details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep PaddleOCR Local, compare it with