openclawvsOpenMapTiles
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | OpenMapTiles | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #24 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 393 247 | 3 211 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 899 | +41 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 1 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.16 · 18 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | PLpgSQL |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 65/100 for OpenMapTiles, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenMapTiles.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 899 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →OpenMapTiles details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep OpenMapTiles, compare it with