llama.cppvsOpenMapTiles
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| llama.cpp | OpenMapTiles | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference | #24 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 132 593 | 3 211 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 236 | +41 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1451 | 1 |
| Latest release | b11954 · 28 Oct 2026 | v3.16 · 18 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | C++ | PLpgSQL |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 65/100 for OpenMapTiles, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1451 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenMapTiles.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 236 stars in 30 days).
llama.cpp details →OpenMapTiles details →