OpenAListvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenAList | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 34 in File Management | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 253 | 24 045 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +785 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.45.31 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 52/100 for OpenAList, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OpenAList.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenAList is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
temporal is growing faster right now (+785 stars in 30 days).
OpenAList details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenAList, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with