open-wearablesvsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +173 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 9 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes scores 64/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.
If you want the quickest setup, open-wearables is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
open-wearables is growing faster right now (+173 stars in 30 days).
open-wearables details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with