Garmin GrafanavsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Garmin Grafana | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 3 523 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +51 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.4.0 · 4 Jun 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Garmin Grafana scores 67/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Garmin Grafana.
If you want the quickest setup, Garmin Grafana is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
Garmin Grafana is growing faster right now (+51 stars in 30 days).
Garmin Grafana details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep Garmin Grafana, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with