open-wearablesvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 6 052 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, open-wearables is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
open-wearables details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with