open-wearablesvsWealthfolio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | Wealthfolio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #5 of 62 in Personal Finance |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 9 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 | +238 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 21 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v3.11.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Wealthfolio scores 73/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.
Wealthfolio ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for open-wearables.
If you want the quickest setup, Wealthfolio is easier to run; open-wearables needs more configuration.
open-wearables details →Wealthfolio details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep Wealthfolio, compare it with