open-wearablesvsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +173 | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 33 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Warpgate scores 75/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.
Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for open-wearables.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; open-wearables needs more configuration.
open-wearables details →Warpgate details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep Warpgate, compare it with