open-wearablesvsvoidaccess
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | voidaccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 2 727 | 948 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +172 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 18 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
open-wearables scores 63/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.
voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for open-wearables.
If you want the quickest setup, open-wearables is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.
open-wearables is growing faster right now (+172 stars in 30 days).
open-wearables details →voidaccess details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep voidaccess, compare it with