open-wearablesvsVigil365
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | Vigil365 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #46 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 2 729 | 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +167 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 2 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v1.1.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C# |
Which one should you pick?
open-wearables scores 63/100 against 49/100 for Vigil365, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Vigil365.
If you want the quickest setup, open-wearables is easier to run; Vigil365 needs more configuration.
open-wearables is growing faster right now (+167 stars in 30 days).
open-wearables details →Vigil365 details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep Vigil365, compare it with