open-wearablesvstrigger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | trigger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 16 647 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 | +248 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 49 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
trigger scores 76/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.
trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for open-wearables.
If you want the quickest setup, open-wearables is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.
open-wearables details →trigger details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep trigger, compare it with