open-wearablesvsTraffic Source
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | Traffic Source | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #10 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 2 727 | 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +172 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
open-wearables scores 63/100 against 51/100 for Traffic Source, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Traffic Source.
open-wearables is growing faster right now (+172 stars in 30 days).
open-wearables details →Traffic Source details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep Traffic Source, compare it with