open-wearablesvsTorollo
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | Torollo | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #15 of 30 in Education |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 449 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 10 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v1.2.5 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
open-wearables scores 63/100 against 47/100 for Torollo, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Torollo.
If you want the quickest setup, Torollo is easier to run; open-wearables needs more configuration.
open-wearables is growing faster right now (+166 stars in 30 days).
open-wearables details →Torollo details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep Torollo, compare it with