open-wearablesvsSuper Productivity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | Super Productivity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #1 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 23 240 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +166 | +1 000 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 22 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v19.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Super Productivity scores 83/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.
Super Productivity ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for open-wearables.
If you want the quickest setup, Super Productivity is easier to run; open-wearables needs more configuration.
Super Productivity is growing faster right now (+1 000 stars in 30 days).
open-wearables details →Super Productivity details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep Super Productivity, compare it with