open-wearablesvsOrca
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 2 727 | 108 958 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +172 | +9 051 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 15 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 63/100 for open-wearables, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for Orca.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; open-wearables needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+9 051 stars in 30 days).
open-wearables details →Orca details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep Orca, compare it with