open-wearablesvsOpenScribe
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | OpenScribe | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #4 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 223 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +173 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 2 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | v0.1.1 · 12 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
open-wearables scores 63/100 against 44/100 for OpenScribe, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OpenScribe.
open-wearables is growing faster right now (+173 stars in 30 days).
open-wearables details →OpenScribe details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep OpenScribe, compare it with