open-wearablesvsOpenELIS Global
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| open-wearables | OpenELIS Global | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 31 in Health & Fitness | #3 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 2 728 | 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +173 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 8 |
| Latest release | 0.10.0 · 16 Oct 2026 | 3.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
open-wearables scores 63/100 against 54/100 for OpenELIS Global, so it is the safer default.
open-wearables ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for OpenELIS Global.
open-wearables is growing faster right now (+173 stars in 30 days).
open-wearables details →OpenELIS Global details →
Swap a project
Keep open-wearables, compare it with
Keep OpenELIS Global, compare it with