Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM)vsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Navigation | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 8 178 | 16 058 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 | +243 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 31 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C++ | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) scores 80/100 against 71/100 for Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM), so it is the safer default.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM).
If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) needs more configuration.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is growing faster right now (+243 stars in 30 days).
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →
Swap a project
Keep Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM), compare it with
Keep Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), compare it with