Open Source POSvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Open Source POS | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Commerce | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 4 468 | 6 046 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +99 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | 3.4.3 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 66/100 for Open Source POS, so it is the safer default.
Open Source POS ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, Open Source POS is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Open Source POS details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Open Source POS, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with