paymentervsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| paymenter | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 13 in Billing | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 2 811 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +500 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.5.9 · 2 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 68/100 for paymenter, so it is the safer default.
paymenter ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, paymenter is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
paymenter is growing faster right now (+500 stars in 30 days).
paymenter details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep paymenter, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with