Open Food Networkvssolidtime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Open Food Network | solidtime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 27 in E-commerce | #3 of 11 in Time Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 1 301 | 9 055 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +127 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 20 |
| Latest release | v5.8.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.22.1 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
solidtime scores 69/100 against 62/100 for Open Food Network, so it is the safer default.
Open Food Network ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for solidtime.
If you want the quickest setup, solidtime is easier to run; Open Food Network needs more configuration.
solidtime is growing faster right now (+127 stars in 30 days).
Open Food Network details →solidtime details →
Swap a project
Keep Open Food Network, compare it with
Keep solidtime, compare it with