MedusaJsvssolidtime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MedusaJs | solidtime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 27 in E-commerce | #3 of 11 in Time Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 36 989 | 9 055 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +538 | +127 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 20 |
| Latest release | v2.22.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.22.1 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
MedusaJs scores 83/100 against 69/100 for solidtime, so it is the safer default.
solidtime ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for MedusaJs.
If you want the quickest setup, solidtime is easier to run; MedusaJs needs more configuration.
MedusaJs is growing faster right now (+538 stars in 30 days).
MedusaJs details →solidtime details →
Swap a project
Keep MedusaJs, compare it with
Keep solidtime, compare it with