ontimevsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ontime | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Event Management | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 970 | 89 753 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +14 | +2 414 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 17 |
| Latest release | v4.15.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 60/100 for ontime, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, ontime is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 414 stars in 30 days).
ontime details →World Monitor details →