ontimevsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ontime | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Event Management | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 969 | 93 040 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 | +1 293 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 19 |
| Latest release | v4.15.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 60/100 for ontime, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for ontime.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; ontime needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 293 stars in 30 days).
ontime details →uptime-kuma details →