ontimevsquackback
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ontime | quackback | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Event Management | #9 of 14 in Customer Support |
| GitHub stars | 969 | 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 15 |
| Latest release | v4.15.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ontime scores 60/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.
ontime ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for quackback.
ontime is growing faster right now (+13 stars in 30 days).
ontime details →quackback details →