OmniVoice-Studiovsterrapod
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniVoice-Studio | terrapod | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #8 of 8 in DevOps |
| GitHub stars | 92 870 | 264 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 929 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 43 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.11.2 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 51/100 for terrapod, so it is the safer default.
terrapod ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 35 for OmniVoice-Studio.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; terrapod needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 929 stars in 30 days).
OmniVoice-Studio details →terrapod details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with
Keep terrapod, compare it with